Un grup parlamentar japonez a declarat într-un raport     :   criza de la centrala nucleara Fukushima a fost "un dezastru profund de om".

                  
      Acest    dezastru  "ar fi putut şi ar fi   putut  fi  prevăzut şi a împiedicat" şi efectele sale ", atenuat de un răspuns uman mai eficient", a spus    raportul , si  a  catalogat deficienţe grave în activitatea  atât  a guvernului  cât şi răspunsul de plante operatorului Tepco lui.

   Este acuzat, de asemenea, convenţii culturale şi o reticenţă a pune la îndoială autoritatea.

   Reactorul   sase    de  la  Centrala  nucleara   de  la   Fukushima Daiichi  a fost grav avariat după  cutremurul    din  11 martie 2011  şi tsunami-ul knock-out pe sisteme de răcire a reactoarelor, ceea ce duce la declansarea  sistemului  de  alarma  şi eliberare de radioactivitate.  In  urma  acestor  evenimente  zeci de mii de locuitori au fost evacuaţi dintr-o zonă de excludere din jurul centralei ,iar lucrătorii- salvatori     au   luptat pentru a aduce reactoarele   sub control.

Tepco a declarat reactoarele  stabile  în decembrie 2011.

Members of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission were appointed to examine the handling of the crisis and make recommendations.

The investigation included 900 hours of hearings and interviews with more than 1,000 people.

In the panel's final report, its chairman said a multitude of errors and wilful negligence had left the plant unprepared for the earthquake and tsunami.

"Although triggered by these cataclysmic events, the subsequent accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant cannot be regarded as a natural disaster," it said.

"It was a profoundly man-made disaster - that could and should have been foreseen and prevented."

After six months of investigation, the panel concluded that the disaster "was the result of collusion between the government, the regulators and Tepco" founded in the failure of regulatory systems.

It said that the situation at the plant worsened in the aftermath of the earthquake because government agencies "did not function correctly", with key roles left ambiguous.

It also highlighted communication failures between Tepco and the office of then Prime Minister Naoto Kan, whose visit to the site in the immediate aftermath of the earthquake "diverted" staff.

The report said regulators should "go through an essential transformation process" to ensure nuclear safety in Japan.

"Japan's regulators need to shed the insular attitude of ignoring international safety standards and transform themselves into a globally trusted entity," it said.

The report made several recommendations including:

• Permanent parliamentary monitoring of the nuclear regulatory body
• Reforming the crisis management system, with more government responsibility for public welfare
• Reforming nuclear energy laws to meet global safety standards
• Monitoring nuclear operators and developing a system for independent investigative bodies

All of Japan's nuclear plants were shut down in the wake of the disaster. But on Sunday the first reactor was restarted in the town of Ohi in Fukui prefecture.

The restart sparked large protests in Tokyo but Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda urged support for the move, saying a return to nuclear power was essential for the economy.

The government is continuing to assess whether other nuclear plants are safe to be restarted.